For people who want to get a thicker head of hair and restore their hairline, hair transplantation is becoming a more and more common cosmetic operation. Which is best for you, though? To find out, let's closely take a look at FUT vs. FUE hair transplants, two of the most popular techniques!

FUT vs. FUE hair transplant

Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE) and Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT) are the two common techniques used in hair transplant procedures. Although both approaches seek to accomplish comparable outcomes, they vary in several ways.

FUT

In FUT, a strip of hair is taken from the donor area of the scalp and divided into separate hair follicles for transplantation. This approach necessitates a more invasive operation with longer recovery periods and is usually advised for people with extensive hair loss.

FUE

A tiny punching tool is used in FUE to remove individual hair follicles straight from the scalp donor region. This technique leaves the scalp with less noticeable scarring, is less intrusive, and doesn't require sutures. However, people who need more grafts or have extensive hair loss might not be a good fit for it.

A lengthy strip of the scalp is taken for Follicular Unit Extraction (FUE), which uses individually removed hair follicles, as opposed to Follicular Unit Transplantation (FUT).

Difference Between FUT and FUE hair transplants

Hair extraction technique is the main way that a FUT and a FUE hair transplant differ from one another. A linear scar is left behind after a strip of hair is removed from the back of the head during FUT, whereas individual follicular units are extracted and transplanted during FUE, which leaves much less scarring. As opposed to a linear scar from FUT, a FUE scar actually looks like a tiny dot. Some FUT hair transplant recipients may therefore choose to grow their hair longer in order to conceal the scar.

FUE or FUT in terms of cost

Cost is frequently a major consideration when deciding between FUE and FUT for a hair transplant treatment.

Since a strip of hair is removed from the donor area during FUT, which can produce more grafts than FUE, FUT is typically the more affordable alternative. Furthermore, FUT takes less time and labour than FUE, which might lead to cheaper overall expenses.

It is crucial to remember that several variables, such as the degree of baldness, the location of the donor area, the number of grafts required, the experience and skill of the surgeon, and the clinic's geographic location, might affect the cost of a hair transplant process.

FUE vs FUT in terms of success rates?

Determining which method is better in terms of success rates can be challenging as the outcome of hair transplants depends on a variety of factors, such as:

• Patient’s age

• Extent and area of hair loss

• Quality and quantity of donor’s hair

• Surgeons’ skills and experience

That being said, research suggests that the success rates of FUE and FUT are comparable. Both techniques can achieve similar levels of hair growth and density, with natural-looking results. The success of an FUE or FUT hair transplant depends majorly on selecting a skilled and experienced surgeon. It equally depends on following the aftercare advice.

A thick head of hair comes with pros and cons to each method of hair transplant.

Advantages of FUE:

• High-quality grafts

• What are the benefits and drawbacks of a hair transplant with FUE?

• Benefits of FUE

• Superior grafts

• Results that look natural

• There was no discomfort throughout the process

• quick recuperation

• Scarring in the donor area is minimal

Advantages of FUT:

• Results that look natural

• In general, lower prices

• Reduced time spent on the procedure

• FUE is able to follow

FUE vs FUT: Which hair transplant is best for me?

Both FUE and FUT have their advantages. Which method is the best suited for you will depend upon your unique situation. If looking for the Best hair transplant doctor in delhi, contact Medrootz today.